This case concerns allegations of false advertising, hair loss, and scalp irritation for those that use MONAT Haircare Products.  The Products are sold through a multi-level marketing scheme that touts them as both safe and natural.  In point of fact, the Products are neither safe or natural.  Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, along with our co-counsel [...]

2018-05-02T19:29:36+00:00February 21st, 2018|Cases, Consumer Protection|

Kentucky Retirement System

On December 27, 2017, CGL and three other firms filed a massive derivative and taxpayer suit to protect the Kentucky Retirement System. The Plaintiffs in the case are participants in the plan; the Defendants include three large hedge fund sellers as well as advisors to the plan. For more press: • KKR, Blackstone Sued by [...]

2018-01-28T04:32:08+00:00January 3rd, 2018|Cases, Complex Litigation, Securities Fraud and Corporate Governance|

Titanium Dioxide Indirect Purchaser Litigation

Jan Harrison, et al. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-01180-BLF (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). The $3.5 million settlement of this  lawsuit was finally approved by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on October 22, 2018.  It alleged that United States producers of titanium dioxide [...]

2018-11-06T20:16:16+00:00August 3rd, 2016|Antitrust, Cases, Complex Litigation|

Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation

In re: Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2670 (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California) CGL has been appointed by the Court to represent commercial food preparer indirect purchasers of tuna fish products in a class action lawsuit alleging a price-fixing conspiracy to artificially inflate prices for packaged tuna products sold [...]

2018-11-06T20:33:53+00:00July 28th, 2016|Antitrust, Cases, Complex Litigation|

2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca

Hadley, et al. v. Subaru of America, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:2015-cv-07210 (U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey). CGL has filed a case against Subaru of America, Inc., alleging that the 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca has a dangerous defect which causes the hood to fly open, damaging the windshield and blinding the [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:15+00:00October 2nd, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|

Debit Card Overdraft Fees

In Re: HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Debit Card Overdraft Fee Litigation, Case No. 2:13-md-02451-ADS-AKT (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York); In re HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.S., Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, Case No. 650562/2011 (New York Supreme Court). Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP, and three other firms, were appointed as Co-Interim Lead [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:15+00:00March 16th, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|

Lumber Liquidators Flooring

Dana Gold v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc., Case. No. 3:14-cv-05373 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). Our firm, along with co-counsel, has brought a case against Lumber Liquidator, Inc. alleging that certain flooring products that it developed, marketed and sold are defective. Alleged defects include gapping, swelling, cracking, and general deterioration. If you [...]

2019-01-03T20:00:06+00:00March 11th, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|


Orshan v. Apple Inc., Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-05659 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). This case concerns allegations that the iOS 8 operating system on certain Apple devices consumes a substantial portion of the total available storage on the devices.  The complaint asserts that Apple provides consumers materially less storage than they are [...]

2018-05-02T19:22:58+00:00January 5th, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|

CertainTeed – Defective Cement Fiberboard Siding

In re: CertainTeed Fiber Cement Siding Litigation, MDL No. 11-2270 (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania). We have joined other firms and brought several class action lawsuits alleging that "CertainTeed WeatherBoard" siding is prone to cracking, surface flaking, warping, shrinking and crumbling. In addition, our lawsuits allege that some of this product [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:15+00:00October 30th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

Yamaha F Series Outboard Motors

Williams, et al. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Case No. 2:13-cv-05066-BRO-VBK (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California). This case concerns severe corrosion in certain first generation Yamaha F series outboard motors. The defect in the motors results in severe corrosion in the dry exhaust portion of the motor, which can ultimately lead [...]

2018-05-02T19:24:40+00:00October 30th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|