Pork Antitrust Litigation

In re: Pork Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 18-01776 (U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota) Mr. Finley and CGL serve as putative co-lead counsel on behalf of commercial and institutional indirect purchasers, as per the group’s pending motion for class certification in a lawsuit alleging the existence of a price-fixing conspiracy to artificially inflate [...]

2022-08-09T04:41:44+00:00November 6th, 2018|Cases, Protein Antitrust|

Contaminated Pet Food Litigation

In re Big Heart Pet Brands Litig., Case No. 4:18-cv-00861-JSW (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). Zeiger v. WellPet LLC, Case No. 3:17-CV-04056-WHO (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). Leppert, et al. v. Champion Petfoods USA, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-04347 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District [...]

2022-04-13T20:52:36+00:00November 6th, 2018|Cases, Consumer Protection|

Titanium Dioxide Indirect Purchaser Litigation

Jan Harrison, et al. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-01180-BLF (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). The $3.5 million settlement of this  lawsuit was finally approved by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on October 22, 2018.  It alleged that United States producers of titanium dioxide [...]

2022-08-10T19:22:50+00:00August 3rd, 2016|Antitrust, Cases, Complex Litigation|

Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation

In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2670 (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California) CGL has been appointed lead counsel on behalf of a class of commercial food preparers in a lawsuit alleging the existence of a price-fixing conspiracy to artificially inflate prices for packaged tuna products. Together, Jonathan Cuneo, Joel [...]

2022-08-09T04:40:49+00:00July 28th, 2016|Cases, Complex Litigation, Protein Antitrust|

Debit Card Overdraft Fees

In Re: HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Debit Card Overdraft Fee Litigation, Case No. 2:13-md-02451-ADS-AKT (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York); In re HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.S., Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, Case No. 650562/2011 (New York Supreme Court). Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP, and three other firms, were appointed as Co-Interim Lead [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:15+00:00March 16th, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|

Lumber Liquidators Flooring

Dana Gold, et al. v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc., Case. No. 3:14-cv-05373 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). CGL is leading a case against Lumber Liquidator, Inc. alleging that bamboo flooring products that it developed, marketed and sold are defective. Alleged defects include gapping, swelling, cracking, and general deterioration. We successfully defended against [...]

2022-04-13T15:59:37+00:00March 11th, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

APPLE STORAGE LITIGATION

Orshan v. Apple Inc., Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-05659 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). This case concerns allegations that the iOS 8 operating system on certain Apple devices consumes a substantial portion of the total available storage on the devices.  The complaint asserts that Apple provides consumers materially less storage than they are [...]

2023-05-25T17:19:11+00:00January 5th, 2015|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|

CertainTeed – Defective Cement Fiberboard Siding

In re: CertainTeed Fiber Cement Siding Litigation, MDL No. 11-2270 (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania). We have joined other firms and brought several class action lawsuits alleging that "CertainTeed WeatherBoard" siding is prone to cracking, surface flaking, warping, shrinking and crumbling. In addition, our lawsuits allege that some of this product [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:15+00:00October 30th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

Deceptive Energy Contracts

Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP has filed lawsuits against third party energy suppliers Ambit Energy, LLC, Viridian Energy, LLC, Smart One Energy, LLC, HIKO Energy, LLC, and XOOM Energy, LLC in New Jersey, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. The complaints allege that the Defendants engage in deceptive bait-and-switch sales models with variable rate [...]

2022-08-10T19:13:28+00:00October 30th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Consumer Protection|
Go to Top