MW Windows Litigation

Gulbankian et al. v. MW Manufacturers, Inc., Case No. No. 1 : 10-CV-10392-RWZ (U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts). Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP, along with several other firms, filed lawsuits against MW Manufacturers, Inc. (“MW”) on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of homeowners who have purchased MW’s Freedom and V-Wood series [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:16+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

GAF – Defective Fiberglass Roofing Shingles

In re: Building Material Corporation of America Asphalt Roofing Shingle Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 8:11–mn–02000–JMC (U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina). We served as co-lead counsel in several class actions against GAF concerning its fiberglass shingles. The complaints allege that GAF designed, manufactured, advertised, warranted and sold defective fiberglass shingles that [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:31+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

IKO – Defective Organic Roofing Shingles

In re: IKO Roofing Shingle Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2104 (U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois). We are the chair of the executive committee in these nationwide class actions against Canadian shingle manufacture, IKO Manufacturing Inc. (“IKO”). The suits allege that IKO designs, manufactures, advertises and sells various defective roofing shingle [...]

2022-04-13T16:26:14+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

CertainTeed – Defective Organic Roofing Shingles

In re: CertainTeed Corp. Roofing Shingle Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1817, (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania). We were co lead counsel in this class action lawsuit, which settled for almost $700 million. The suit alleged that CertainTeed's organic shingles failed to perform as marketed and that CertainTeed knowingly and intentionally [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:31+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

Chinese Drywall Litigation

Our firm, along with co-counsel, brought a series of cases in Federal and State courts across the country challenging the use of defective Chinese drywall in residential construction. The defective drywall emits, among other things, sulfur compounds that cause significant physical damage to the affected homes by corroding the electrical, plumbing and HVAC systems. All [...]

2018-05-02T19:27:45+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

Uponor – Defective F1906 Plumbing Fittings

George v. Uponor, Inc. et al., Case. No. 0:12-cv-00249, (U.S. District Court for the district of Minnesota). We have brought a class action against Uponor alleging that it designs and sells defective Yellow Brass Fittings and components made from high zinc content brass that were defectively designed and prematurely corrode when drinking water runs through them. [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:31+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

Zurn – Defective Plumbing Systems

In re: Zurn Pex Plumbing Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1958, (U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota). We were chair of the executive committee in this nation-wide class action which comprised of homes and business-owners, who brought several class actions against Zurn Pex, Inc. and Zurn Industries LLP (“Zurn”) concerning alleged defects associated [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:31+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

Gentek – Defective Steel Siding

Eliason et al. v. Gentek Building Products, et al., Case. No. 1:10-cv-2093 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio). We are co-lead counsel in a nationwide class action against Gentek Building Products, Inc., a leading manufacture of vinyl, aluminum and steel siding products. Our lawsuits allege that Gentek steel and aluminum siding was [...]

2023-05-25T17:19:56+00:00June 16th, 2014|Cases, Complex Litigation, Defective Building Products|

NCAA

In re: NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation, Civil Action No. 4:09-cv-01967 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California). Our firm is involved in a class action involving thousands of former Division 1 men's basketball and football players who allege the NCAA violated federal antitrust law, by unlawfully preventing former players from [...]

2018-01-14T19:51:32+00:00May 12th, 2014|Antitrust, Cases, Complex Litigation|

AUTO PARTS PRICE-FIXING ANTITRUST LITIGATION

In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 12-md-02311 (E.D. Mich.). The U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, in the largest international antitrust investigation in its history, has charged 48 companies and 65 executives, and collected more than $2.9 billion in fines stemming from its investigation into price fixing, bid rigging, and other anticompetitive conduct [...]

2022-08-09T14:02:14+00:00May 12th, 2014|Antitrust, Cases, Complex Litigation|
Go to Top