Skip to content
Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP Logo
  • HOME
  • OUR TEAM
  • PRACTICE
    • AREAS OF PRACTICE
    • CURRENT CASES
    • ACCOMPLISHMENTS
    • UPDATES
      • MDOC VERDICT
  • NEWS
  • CONTACT
Robert J Cyncar Modal

ROBERT J. CYNKAR

EDUCATION

  • J.D., New York University (1977) Member, NYU Law Review
  • A.B. (magna cum laude), Princeton University (1974)

SUBSTANTIVE PRACTICE AREAS

  • Corporate Governance
  • Environmental & Energy
  • Litigation Against Federal Agencies
  • Toxic Torts

BAR ADMISSIONS

  • District of Columbia
  • Illinois
  • Virginia

COURT ADMISSIONS

  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals (DC , First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuits)
  • U.S. District Court, DC
  • U.S. District Court, E.D. Va.
  • U.S. District Court, Md.
  • U.S. District Court, N.D. Ill.
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS

  • American Bar Association
  • District of Columbia Bar Association
  • Fairfax County Bar Association
  • Illinois Bar Association
  • The Federalist Society
  • Virginia Bar Association

ROBERT J. CYNKAR has been an active member of the legal communities of Washington, DC and Virginia for 30 years as a trial and appellate lawyer, both in private practice and in government service, and as a member of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee staff.

Before entering private practice, Mr. Cynkar served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia (Criminal Division), as a Special Assistant to U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, and as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Justice Department’s Civil Division, where he oversaw over 100 litigators of the Federal Programs Branch and the Office of Consumer Litigation. In that capacity, Mr. Cynkar was the primary lawyer responsible for defending in the federal district courts the programs and regulatory initiatives of nearly all federal departments and agencies. This litigation ran the gamut of constitutional and statutory issues that could be raised by federal action. Mr. Cynkar personally argued many of the most sensitive or controversial cases. In the more political realm, Mr. Cynkar served on the Senate Judiciary Committee staffs of Senator Bob Dole, and then of Senator Paul Laxalt, dealing with a range of issues related to federal regulation and the regulatory process.

In private practice for the last 20 years, Mr. Cynkar has brought his broad experience in complex and innovative regulatory, administrative law, and constitutional matters to bear on behalf of individual and institutional clients, including insurance companies, financial institutions, utilities, healthcare providers, state governments, federal programs, and public interest groups. These matters have involved diverse subjects ranging from property rights and takings issues, ratemaking and energy regulation, healthcare regulation and related Medicare and Medicaid issues, and the regulation of financial institutions, through environmental, toxic tort, and serious personal injury issues, to the defense of First Amendment rights. Mr. Cynkar’s work on these matters has often involved a blend of litigation and legislative strategies.

Mr. Cynkar has tried over 25 cases in federal and state courts.  He has briefed numerous appeals in the majority of Federal Circuits and in State Supreme Courts, and in the U. S. Supreme Court, and has personally argued many of those appeals.  Among his noteworthy cases are: U.S. v. Fleming (E.D.Va. 1984) (successful prosecution of a drunk driver who killed a mother of 11 for second-degree murder); U.S. v. Winstar (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1996 ) (holding that even the requirements of a broad change in regulatory policy by Congress cannot excuse the federal government’s breach of contract); U.S. ex rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions (E.D.Va. 2009) (successful defense of a government contractor accused of violating the False Claims Act in a bet-the-company case); Livingston v. Virginia Dept. of Transportation (Va. Sup. Ct. 2012) (establishing that a damaging for public use does not need to rise to the level of a taking to qualify for just compensation under the Virginia Constitution); Settle v. RGR, (Prince William Cir. Ct. 2012) (over $3 million jury award for the widow of a truck driver killed in a collision with a train).

admin2018-09-18T19:37:45+00:00September 18th, 2018|
CALL OUR EXPERTS TODAY 1.202.789.3960

DISCLAIMER

This website is provided for informational purposes only. It provides no legal advice. You should not act on the basis of any content included in this website without seeking the appropriate legal advice from counsel. Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP expressly disclaims all liability with respect to any actions that may be taken based on the content of this website. Transmission of information through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Any electronic inquiry through this website or by email to one of our lawyers does not, by itself, create an attorney-client relationship or contractually obligate us to represent you, regardless of the content of such inquiry. We generally do not undertake the representation of a client until the client signs a mutually satisfactory retainer agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions under which our legal services will be provided. Any result described on this website does not guarantee a similar outcome in any representation that we make undertake for you. Each representation has unique facts and circumstances that may affect the result. The jurisdictions in which our lawyers are licensed to practice are indicated within each lawyer’s biography in the “Our Lawyers” section of the website. Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP does not endorse, and is not responsible for, any third-party content that may be accessed through this website.

MEDIA

CGL Media Page (2)
© Copyright  |   All Rights Reserved   |    Disclaimer   |   Media Inquiries
TwitterEmailLinkedIn
Page load link
Go to Top